Springfield Construction invites residents to attend a neighbourhood Open House regarding the proposed apartment building at 4063 Upper Middle Road. the workshop will include a presentation, workshop exercise and questions and comments.
City Councillor Blair Lancaster and City of Burlington Planing staff will be in attendance. Please RSVP to firstname.lastname@example.org and indicate the number of people attending.
RSVP to email@example.com and indicate the number of people attending. For more information about this proposal, visit 4063 Upper Middle Proposal
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
7:00 PM – 8:30 PM
Tansley Woods, Community Centre – Youth/Seniors Room
Update on Pinemeadow Park – Natural Playground Opportunity
Community Meeting – Sept. 30
A community meeting will take place on Saturday, Sept. 30 from 10 – 11 a.m. at Pinemeadow Park. Come out to show your support for this project. City staff will be running a pop-up n’ play program for children for parents who wish to take part in the meeting.
In the event of rain, the meeting will be held at Angela Coughlan Pool.
For more information, contact Denise Beard, Manager of Community Development, at firstname.lastname@example.org and follow the existing community facebook group at www.facebook.com/BurlingtonNaturalPlaygrounds.
A group of residents looking to construct a natural playground at Pinemeadow Park was successful at securing $5000 from the city to assist them in developing a natural playground.
There is an opportunity to expand the natural playground and add a water element into the project, thanks to a potential donation from a private foundation but a show of community support is needed. The funder needs to see community is willing to assist in the design and build of certain aspects of the playground.
I wanted to let residents know that a pre-hearing date has been set by the Ontario Municipal Board. This has been scheduled for Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at City Hall, 426 Brant Street, Burlington in Room 305.
Official notice of the hearing will be circulated by the appellant in accordance with the Board’s rules.
How to attend:
This pre-hearing is open to the public and no pre-registration is required.
Staff report regarding Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard (PB-100-16) was considered at the Development and Infrastructure Committee on December 13, 2016. After much debate I brought forward a motion to refuse the development. At the City of Burlington Council meeting on Dec. 19, 2016, Council passed the following recommendation to refuse the development proposal.
Refuse the application for Official Plan Amendment to modify the “Residential-High Density – Site Specific Policy” affecting 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard to permit a residential development consisting of traditional townhouses, stacked townhouses, and apartments with a maximum density of 305 units per hectare and maximum height of 19 storeys; and
Refuse the application for amendment to Zoning By-law 2020 to rezone lands at 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard to permit two (2) 19 storey apartment buildings, 21 traditional townhouses, and 150 stacked townhouse units.
While I believe that many of the improvements and modifications made by the developer were good for the Alton community, I had hoped and expected the applicant to reduce the tower height, but unfortunately this was not the case. In essence, it was the no reduction of height that formed my decision to refuse.
Despite this, there was one good outcome of this planning event which was that staff have agreed to review the traffic concerns in Alton. This will help to address traffic in a more robust fashion and I expect a plan for traffic calming and improved traffic flow will result.
I will provide more information as it becomes available.
Residents are invited to join me and staff to attend a drop in Public Information Centre scheduled for March 9, 2017 at the Haber Recreation Centre, 3040 Tim Dobbie Drive from 6:00pm to 7:30pm. There is no formal presentation at this meeting. Residents will have an opportunity to discuss the proposed traffic calming plan with staff to answer any questions and provide comments.
Please see links to letters and maps that were circulated.
Transportation Department has advised me that the following Ward 6 streets met the criteria for a reduced speed limit.
The required notification letters will be sent out this week and the signage will be installed by mid-spring.
Adventurine Avenue (entire length) at 40km/h
Jordan Avenue (entire length) at 40km/h
Tim Dobbie Drive (Thomas Alton Boulevard to Steeplechase Drive) at 40km/h
I want to thank the hundreds of residents who have participated in meetings about this proposal as well as those who have sent me written correspondence regarding Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard. As I have previously stated I was not in support of this development and I appreciated all your emails, phone calls and comments. Please know that these comments were provided to Council, even the last minute comments submitted that were in the delegation package or by email. Staff report regarding Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard (PB-100-16) was considered at the Development and Infrastructure Committee on December 13, 2016. After much debate I brought forward a motion to refuse the development. However I want to disclose that this was a difficult decision because the developer had made many improvements to the development including:
A reduction in 79 units
A reduction in the maximum density from 335 units per hectare to 305 units per hectare
A reduction in the floor area ratio (far) from 2.54:1 to 2.5:1
A reduction in the number of vehicle parking spaces from 832 to 759 (1,059 spaces are required by the zoning by-law)
The realignment of the podium of the north building (street wall), fronting on palladium way, to respond to the curvature of palladium way
A reduction in the tower floor plates to less than 750 m2
A reduction in the maximum length of the tower walls from 40 m to 35 m
An increase in the minimum separation distance between towers from 21.5 m to 28.5 m
The introduction of tower step backs with a minimum step back distance of 3 m
The integration of an underground parking ramp within the apartment building
A reduction of the number of underground parking levels within the apartment building from 4 levels to 3 levels
The replacement of an internal block of stacked townhouse units with a surface parking lot, including highly-visible accessible, visitor and carshare parking spaces
An increase in the size of the shared private outdoor amenity area (common open space) from 1,700 m 2 to 1,875.8 m2 and adding additional visitor parking spaces at grade adjacent to the traditional townhouses
An increase in minimum amenity area to 17 m2 per dwelling unit
Additional changes and modifications have been made to the site layout including the internal circulation, and interconnection of the underground parking garages, which will contribute to a better functioning site
Enlargement of green space area
Exit and entrance on palladium way to ease congestion on Thomas Alton.
I also felt that the new proposal was much better for the residents who surround this development because of the transitioning factors of the town homes. The original zoning allows for 10 storey buildings, and when I put myself in their shoes, thinking of a 10 storey building looming over my back yard, I cringed.
While I believe that many of these modifications are good for the Alton community, I had hoped and expected the applicant to reduce the tower height, but unfortunately this was not the case. In essence, it was the no reduction of height that formed my decision to refuse.
If the development had received approval, staff were also recommending the following community benefits as part of Section 37 of the Planning Act:
The applicant agrees to construct and the future condominium corporation will maintain a surface outdoor amenity space on the subject lands. These open space lands will be developed to a high standard and public access will be assured by way of an easement to be registered on title of the lands allowing public access to and use of this park space. This amenity space will be subject to a Landscape Plan and lighting review at the site plan approval stage. This indirect community benefit has been assessed at a value of $519,800.00.
The applicant agrees to provide 20 residential dwelling units at a cost of $35,000 below market rate (approximately $262,000.00) to a housing provider (such as but not limited to Region of Halton Housing, Habitat for Humanity, etc.) for the purposes of delivering affordable housing on a long term basis. This indirect community benefit has been assessed at a value of $700,000.00.
The applicant agrees to provide a direct community benefit valued at $60,000.00 towards improvements at Doug Wright Park, located in close proximity to the subject lands. It is anticipated that these funds will be spent on the creation of a community garden. The City agrees to erect signage acknowledging financial contributions were made by ADI Developments Inc. by the community garden facility.
The City will also receive a $60,000.00 financial contribution to be placed into a specific reserve fund for Doug Wright Park on Palladium Way. It is anticipated that these funds will be spent on improvements to Doug Wright Park within 5 years of receipt to allow sufficient timing for park planning, procurement, and installation of agreed upon items.
With refusal of the development these community benefits would no longer apply.
What are the next steps?
The recommendation to refuse the development will go to Council for final approval on Monday Dec. 19th.
Will this be the end?
It’s never over till it’s over and under the Planning Act the developer has the right to appeal Councils decision. This is a risk as this means someone else not from our community would be making a decision about this development and the developer could change the proposal and ask for more density. I would also like to point out that our professional planning staff were in support of this new proposal, this in itself would make a defense difficult for Council at the OMB.
One good outcome of this planning event is that staff have agreed to review the traffic concerns in Alton. This will help to address traffic in a more robust fashion and I expect a plan for traffic calming and improved traffic flow will result.
Again, I can’t thank residents enough for taking the time and effort to become involved in this process.